Why didn’t Madonna, a billionaire, give the dad some money so he could raise his son? If the reason that he couldn’t care for his son was that he had to farm, isn’t she just taking advantage of his economic situation? Why is the child more deserving of financial support (at the terrible cost of losing his remaining family and homeland) than the farmer who is a victim of drought or whatever? If we fall on hard times, should we be cast aside while the children we can’t afford to raise are scooped up by the wealthy? Of course, the child will have a fabulously better life as Madonna’ s child, but is being a rich celebrity’s adopted child really the height of happiness? Just because it’s what I fantasize about all the time? At least it increases the likelihood of a tell-all Mommy Dearest by one third. (Watch the clip)

– Clancy Cavnar