The WOW Report

  • WOW Report
  • About
  • RuPaul’s Drag Race Live!
  • WOW Presents Plus
  • What to Watch
  • Store
You are here: Home / Culture / #LGBTQ: DOJ Argues That the Civil Rights Act of ’64 “Does Not Protect Homosexuals”

#LGBTQ: DOJ Argues That the Civil Rights Act of ’64 “Does Not Protect Homosexuals”

By Trey Speegle on July 26, 2017 7:44 pm

Tonight the Department of Justice moved to further undermine rights for LGBTQ people ensuring that they are treated unfairly in the workplace. A brief was filed arguing that prohibition of sex discrimination under federal law does NOT include the prohibition of discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.

Barely 12 hours after Trump launched a historic assault banning active duty transgender service members, his administration has told a federal appeals court the Civil Rights Act of 1964 does not protect “homosexuals” from discrimination.

In short, the amicus brief claims sexual orientation discrimination is not sex discrimination, contrary to the published position of at least one federal agency, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act “makes it unlawful to discriminate against someone on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex (including pregnancy and gender identity) or religion.”

Tonight the Dept. of Justice filed an amicus brief in Zarda v. Altitude Express. Lambda Legal summarized the case:

In September 2010, [Donald] Zarda, a skydiver, filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York against his former employer, Altitude Express, Inc, alleging that the company violated the Civil Rights Act by discriminating against him because of his sexual orientation. The district court rejected his claim, saying that the Civil Rights Act does not protect him for bias he endured for being a gay man. Tragically, in October 2014, Zarda died in a base jumping accident in Switzerland.

In January 2017, Gregory Antollino argued an appeal on behalf of Zarda’s estate asking a three judge panel of the Second Circuit to revisit its precedent and hold that sexual orientation discrimination is a form of sex discrimination and therefore illegal under the Civil Rights Act. The three-judge panel denied Zarda’s claim in April 2017, but held that Zarda would be entitled to a new trial if the full Second Circuit agreed with his arguments about Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.

The ACLU, in its amicus brief in the case, writes that the

“Supreme Court has explained that sex discrimination occurs whenever an employer takes an employee’s sex into account when making an adverse employment decision. Courts have applied this principle to countless forms of employer bias, from cases involving a ban on hiring mothers of preschool-aged children to bias against Asian-American women to the failure to promote a Big Eight accounting firm partnership candidate because she was considered to be ‘macho.’ Time and again, courts have refused to allow generalizations about men and women – or about certain types of men and women – to play any role in employment decisions.”

The DOJ is now arguing that it’s OK to discriminate against LGBT people in the workplace.

In short, the DOJ’s argument consists of these bullet points:

• TITLE VII’S BAR AGAINST DISCRIMINATION BECAUSE OF SEX IS NOT VIOLATED UNLESS MEN AND WOMEN ARE TREATED UNEQUALLY

• DISCRIMINATION BECAUSE OF SEXUAL ORIENTATION IS NOT DISCRIMINATION BECAUSE OF SEX UNDER TITLE VII
“Among Zarda’s boosters is the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, a largely autonomous federal agency that handles civil rights disputes in the workplace, which supported Zarda last month in its own court filing,”

He notes, “the Justice Department argues, ‘the EEOC is not speaking for the United States and its position about the scope of Title VII is entitled to no deference beyond its power to persuade.'”

This move was designed to create chaos and distract. We can fight from several positions at once. Don’t fall for it. #Resist


(via NCMR)

Show the love:

  • Tweet
  • Share on Tumblr

Filed Under: Culture, Featured, LBGTQ, Politics

More

Beanie Feldstein! Jean Smart! Hannah Einbinder! Richard Ayoade! The WOW Report for Radio Andy!

Beanie Feldstein! Jean Smart! Hannah Einbinder! Richard Ayoade! The WOW Report for Radio Andy!

by Blake Jacobs on May 20, 2022 11:00 am

Queens Assemble! Watch a Supercut of Shoutouts from Queens at DragCon

Queens Assemble! Watch a Supercut of Shoutouts from Queens at DragCon

by Andrea James on May 13, 2022 4:50 pm

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Trending


Bob Mackie –Who Sketched Marilyn’s Dress in ’62– Said Kim Wearing the Original “Was a Big Mistake”

Jiggly Caliente Ru-Vealed She’s the First ‘Drag Race Philippines’ Judge at RuPaul’s DragCon

Get Your First Look at ‘RuPaul’s Drag Race All Stars 7’

#DragCon22 – Kennedy Davenport Receives Standing Ovations at Her Legendary WOWIE Awards Performance

Here’s Your Day 2 Recap of RuPaul’s DragCon ’22!

About

From the creators of The Eyes of Tammy Faye, Party Monster, Million Dollar Listing, RuPaul's Drag Race, I Am Britney Jean, Big Freedia, and more.

Sarah Jessica Parker & Matthew Broderick! Regine! Jennifer Grey! The WOW Report for Radio Andy!
Nicolas Cage! Elon Musk! Paris Hilton! Margaret Mitchell! Charo Joins for the WOW Report for Radio Andy!
Michelle Obama! Devo! Betty Ford! Kardashians! Drag Race Finale! The WOW Report for Radio Andy!
Kim K! Billie Eilish! Molly Shannon! Laurie Anderson! The WOW Report for Radio Andy!
Olivia! Brad Pitt! Gaga! Alec Mapa Joins Us for Our 300th Episode of the WOW Report for Radio Andy!

© 2021 World of Wonder Productions, Inc | World of Wonder is a trademark of World of Wonder Productions, Inc | Privacy

Copyright © 2022 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in