September 30, 2006
21st-Century Vox
What the Hell Happened to You?
I was watching that horrible show Celebrity Duets the other night and, as I was trying desperately to continue looking at the screen as the awkward contestants got chastised by the likes of Marie Osmond and Little Richard, they call Chaka Kahn to the stage. My first thought was, “Damn, how did they get Chaka Kahn to perform on this tragic show?” but once she appeared on stage my thought shifted to “Damn how did they get Chaka Kahn ONTO the stage?” She strolled out looking more like Ghengis Kahn, and I was afraid that she may just eat the person she was doing the duet with. I mean, GOOD GOD SHE’S BIG. Granted, she was never a petite flower, but when in God’s name did she decide that she could let herself go like that? Chaka, honey, gravy is not a beverage!
Then I started thinking about my recent 10-year high school reunion (yes, I am old, just shut up), and how all the people I had been friends with for so long had completely given up on taking care of themselves. The guys I played ball with all had beer bellies and greasy unkempt hair, and the girls looked like they hadn’t seen the inside of a MAC makeup counter in years. Yes, some of them have children and therefore, have completely lost any self-awareness as most parents do, but we aren’t even 30 yet and you're just gonna give up? So I decided I would do some research on celebrities who were all the rage in their day and then let themselves go, making the public wonder, “What the hell happened to you?” I came across some interesting stars and I started to form some theories about just when it is acceptable to let yourself go.
In the '70s, the music charts were primarily dominated by male rock bands, but the sexy Wilson sisters of Heart forged ahead with their powerful sounds and made a name for women in rock. Through the '80s, with a ton of shoulder pads and crazy mall hair, the sisters began to transform and, if you'll remember back to the videos, Ann was always shot in the weird squeezed screen image that would make her appear thinner. A few years back, I went to a concert and was mesmerized when they called the women to the stage – I couldn’t believe Ann Wilson was weighing close to 250 pounds. Some people say that weight gain comes from genetics, but Nancy Wilson looked 10 years younger and 120 pounds lighter than her sister. I just don’t see how a person so in the spotlight could not see that she was becoming so huge.
On the opposite end of the scale, so to speak, would be the young Hollywood glam girls of today who can barely keep bracelets around their wrists because they are so thin. Nicole Richie, Keira Knightley, and Lindsay Lohan come to mind when I think about girls who seem to have lost all sense of what their bodies look like. Yes, I understand that the camera adds 10 pounds and you don’t want to be called chubby and, yes, I understand that drugs can cause crazy weight loss (Lindsay), but isn’t there that moment when you see yourself and think “Jesus Christ, I look like shit!” I mean, even if you have body issues, I would think that you would want to look crazy good, not like an extra from Land of the Dead. Oh, and another tip for women like Melanie Griffith and Meg Ryan…there is such a thing as too much plastic surgery.
And speaking of plastic surgery, I haven’t forgotten about the men, who in some ways are even more pathetic when it comes to letting themselves go. Mickey Rourke was the sexy star of movies like Angel Heart and Nine½ Weeks. Yeah, the movies sucked, but he was an attractive guy. Seeing him recently, all I can say is “LAY OFF THE DRUGS, MAN.” He looks like an 80-year-old homeless person or Sloth from Goonies, and I know he can still afford a stylist or something even if he can’t dress himself. Another example is in this picture, Courtney Cox is the one who is pregnant, but I think we can all agree that David Arquette is the one who is doing the eating for two. What the hell happened? In his heyday, Marlon Brando was friggin' hot. He could have competed with dudes like James Dean and Montgomery Clift when it came to great bodies and sexy looks. At some point in his life he must have decided that the scenery was not the only thing he should be chewing because by the end of his life he was pushing 400 pounds. Why?

Maybe it sounds shallow of me to want people to stay looking great and go gracefully into maturity. Johnny Depp, Susan Sarandon, Brad Pitt, and Tina Turner are stars that look better the older they get. If they can do it, doesn’t it make sense that others could as well? So I guess my question is, What is it in life that tells us we can now let ourselves go? I’m not advocating that youth and beauty are so important that we should all kill ourselves striving to achieve a goal; in fact, I am saying just the opposite. As we get older we should learn to appreciate the beauty of aging gracefully without completely forgetting that our appearance is something that is not just for ourselves, but is for the rest of the world to see and judge us by. BLOG HARD! (Oh, and exercise.)
It’s always a business doing pleasure with you!
– Dylan Vox
Related entries:
- 21st-Century Vox: What You Wish For The other day,...
- 21st-Century Vox: So You Had A Bad Day Last...
- 21st-Century Vox: Hillary Clinton would be the best president...
- 21st-Century Vox: Testing Your Gag Reflex Wanna see something...
- 21st-Century Vox: Dylan Vox I’ve often been criticized on...
Comments
-- UrethraFranklin
| September 30, 2006 5:41 PM
I feel sorry for you, Dylan. How sad will it be when your words come back to haunt you in ten or twenty years. And isn't it hypocritical to condemn people for too much plastic surgery, when they're only trying live up to standards set by people just like you? People who represent an over-commercialized society which is far too often incapable or unwilling to read beyond a book's cover...
-- sparks
| September 30, 2006 6:30 PM
I absolutely agree with Urethra and Sparks for the reasons that they have given. I believe that people should never have to alter their appearances just because they want to be judged less harshly by the superficial people in our society. The only reason why people should consciously decide to change their appearances is so they can be happy with themselves on the inside. If we have learned nothing from "The Biggest Loser," it is that if you want to make a change in your life, the only person that you should listen to is yourself, because at the end of the day, the only person that you have to face is yourself.
But if you think that you are perfect the way that you are, and you love every day of your life, then you should not be expected to change one damn thing, regardless of the supposed norms that people have put on society. And when people think about Chaka Khan, Ann Wilson, and Aretha Franklin, for example, they will not be remembered by the sizes of their bodies. They will be remembered by their legendary musical talents, and the effect that their music had on the people who listened to them.
The way that you look isn't everything. Your personality and the effect that you have on other lives, however, is. And this is why I stand in solidarity next to my sister from another mister, Urethra, and will also love you even if you were 400 pounds with sagging man boobs, because wanting to hang out with people just because of their looks and not because of their personality is incredibly sad.
-- RockMyReality21
| September 30, 2006 8:12 PM
i disagree about nicole and linsday, i think they look pretty skinny. i hate how people judge skinny people. but dylan, more importantly:
im pregnant.
mwahxx
-- jordanprances
| September 30, 2006 9:46 PM
So Snowflake, that's all you saw in that whole long post was fucking Nichole and Lyndsey? They look like shit. They are talentless press whores, too bad too. Lyndsey use to be cute. Now she's just pathetic.
Watch who you idolize Snowflake, one day you might have to explain why.
-- BrightGreenHeadwear
| October 1, 2006 7:03 AM
My initial reaction was to side with my bitches - they always know the score. However, I THINK I understand what Vox was going for here. We are judeged on our looks everyday, by every person we encounter. It's true.
I know I'm not the only person that's run into a good friend at say, the mall or the free clinic, and thought....wow, s/he looks like shit today...and those lesions...yuck. Regardless of what you think of them as person, it's impossible NOT to have an opinion of their physical attributes. Hell part of a general psych. evaluation is to describe how the person presents physically.
It's part of the human experience to judge a book by it's cover. And it's not uncommon to feel secretly happy when someone attractive looks like shit. If outward appearances weren't important, we wouldn't have commercial package design, hygiene products, or fashion in general. We'd all be running around looking like extras from Logan's Run.
Now, what Vox didn't address is that of course this is not the way we SHOULD live. If you base your sense of self on what OTHER people think, you may as well start saving for that therapy bill early. Not to mention, there are FEW things more boring than someone who's obsessed with outward appearances. Sure you might look great...but that's of little use when people consistantly run away from you with blood pouring from their eyes.
YCKTR
-- nosebleeds
| October 1, 2006 8:37 AM
Mr. Vox, do you have a myspace or some way for me to get in contact with you?
<3
-- UrethraFranklin
| October 1, 2006 8:56 AM
oh, that is so typical of you, brightgreenheadwear. just attack poor little old me, because you're bored and have nothing better to do with your time.
but i stand by my decision. i think nicole and lindsay are self made and i appreciate them for that. i just don't think their thinness should be picked at.
and DON'T THINK i don't know it was one of you bitches writing that i need to "lay off the meth" when perez posted my I HEART PEREZ pic. grow up. ily roo! mwahxx
-- jordanprances
| October 1, 2006 9:07 AM
btw, i think that CHAKA looked amazing on CELEBRITY DUETS - and she was in great voice! i think i saw a different episode - she was wearing this crazy brown fringe outfit...i suspect i re-wound it about 4 times....BUT, not as many times as i re-wound every PATTI LABELLE appearance on that show! OMG!
oh, and back to the point, i also think there is a certain beauty to these aneroxic stars....celebrity is the disease of the 21st century, so there is something refreshingly beautiful about watching it physically manifest itself.
-- Randy b
| October 1, 2006 10:04 AM
Yes Randy...watching people like Karen Carpenter starve themselves to death is truly beautiful.
WTF?
Your statement really makes me rethink my opinion of you. I felt icky just reading it.
YCKTR
-- nosebleeds
| October 1, 2006 10:32 AM
^^^Tnaks ROO. I couldnt quite put it into words but that sums it up quite nicely.
-- UrethraFranklin
| October 1, 2006 11:27 AM
he's seeing it from an artistic point of view. RANDAL, i think that's a really fascinating way to see it. mwah.
rooster, you are still mean.
xx
-- jordanprances
| October 1, 2006 11:43 AM
and urethra, you have a hard time putting ANYTHING into words without a zillion exclamation points, and without kissing their ass.
x
-- jordanprances
| October 1, 2006 11:44 AM
guys,
its like the beauty of a thunderstorm, cmon, cut me a break.
my larger point is that we seem to be on a mission
to expose and reveal all. pop will eat itself and starve
itself to death in the process.
-- Randy b
| October 1, 2006 11:50 AM
FUCK YOU JORDAN
hows that for putting it into words without exclamation points
-- UrethraFranklin
| October 1, 2006 12:38 PM
I love it. I love beautiful stars who have let themselves go. I love charting the trajectory of the stunning into the puffy and blurred. It's awesome. Absolutely the best thing about celebrity watching. I don't hate Marlon for becoming 400lbs or Mae West for over doing the face lifts. For a moment they were the most fabulous things that walked, and don't have to justify themselves to anyone. Insisting that they be 22 for ever is pointless. Of course if they try to be 22 for ever and screw up dreadfully that's all the better.
-- wendy
| October 1, 2006 1:31 PM
that actually would have been an appropriate place for an exclamation point.
-- jordanprances
| October 1, 2006 3:11 PM
guys,
its like the beauty of a thunderstorm, cmon, cut me a break.
my larger point is that we seem to be on a mission
to expose and reveal all. pop will eat itself and starve
itself to death in the process.
----snip----
Upon further reflection, I still think it was a creepy thing to say.
Last I checked, thunderstorms didn't puke hail and lightening all over the earth in an effort to be just like that airbrushed version they saw in an Ansel Adams photo.
Just sayin...
-- nosebleeds
| October 1, 2006 4:34 PM
he's seeing it from an artistic point of view. RANDAL, i think that's a really fascinating way to see it. mwah.
rooster, you are still mean.
xx
-----snip-----
It's not my fault, I'm just drawn this way.
And I do understand Randy's point, I just think it was an irresponsible way to explain it.
At this point, pop culture isn't even JUST pop culture anymore, it's caricature of itself. Interesting to watch and read about, yes - but it's a little gross to canonize the destructive images. That sort of mentality is what killed people like Gia, and Karen Carpenter.
However, you must please remember...what the fuck do I know?
YCKTR
-- nosebleeds
| October 1, 2006 4:48 PM
but then who would all the junkies look up to, if there was no gia, and the anorexics, if there was no mary kate.
mwwwwah i still luv u rooster xox
-- jordanprances
| October 1, 2006 5:42 PM
but then who would all the junkies look up to, if there was no gia, and the anorexics, if there was no mary kate.
mwwwwah i still luv u rooster xox
----snip-----
Who doesn't...?
YCKTR
-- nosebleeds
| October 1, 2006 6:29 PM
By the way, good topic...we haven't seen this much action since James St. James.
Wait...that didn't come out right....
YCKTR
-- nosebleeds
| October 1, 2006 6:38 PM
roo:
you probably think this song is about you.
ahaha xx
-- jordanprances
| October 1, 2006 8:56 PM
You guys aren't even discussing this column, you're just disagreeing with a side topic that Randy conjured.
Personally I'd like to open a forum where you guys could discuss and expand topics without losing them when the blog flips a page. But as well, so you don't necessarily have to give the illusion that Vox's article was anything more than a few shallow comments that drew criticism which was more interesting than anything he actually said.
Just sayin..
-- sparks
| October 1, 2006 9:34 PM
Pop culture is significant and wonderful but can't transcend like capital H History, altho it closely imitates it. It's merest evanescence compared to hideous wars and worse presidents. Apollinaire described something like the beauty of the thunderstorm in the exploding stars and beautiful fireworks of warfare. Who will the junkies look up to? The beautiful and the damaged of course, and there'll be plenty of those, The Young and The Limbless, from our never ending war. I think there's a huge pop cultural impact brewing from this war, more so even than Vietnam, it'll be like the Surrealists and the Futurists all over again.
-- wendy
| October 1, 2006 9:47 PM
(sparks, i agree. but i felt that it was my duty to defend poor miss richie, hasn't she suffered enough? plus, dylan is the father of my unborn child, so ...)
-- jordanprances
| October 2, 2006 2:28 PM
Pop culture is significant and wonderful but can't transcend like capital H History, altho it closely imitates it. It's merest evanescence compared to hideous wars and worse presidents. Apollinaire described something like the beauty of the thunderstorm in the exploding stars and beautiful fireworks of warfare. Who will the junkies look up to? The beautiful and the damaged of course, and there'll be plenty of those, The Young and The Limbless, from our never ending war. I think there's a huge pop cultural impact brewing from this war, more so even than Vietnam, it'll be like the Surrealists and the Futurists all over again.
----snip----
Pull my finger
YCKTR
-- nosebleeds
| October 2, 2006 2:30 PM
I like the idea of bring back the petty bickering and personal attacks. Can we please have our own venting area?!? Just like old times. I miss attacking Jordan.
!!!xoxxo!!!
love,
Shelly.
-- BrightGreenHeadwear
| October 5, 2006 6:31 AM







~~As we get older we should learn to appreciate the beauty of aging gracefully without completely forgetting that our appearance is something that is not just for ourselves, but is for the rest of the world to see and judge us by.~~
WHAT?? Where you pre-occupied in the shower when you thought of this?? Yes we do see outer appearance...but is it fair to judge people by that alone? I have met alot of people that became more attractive to me as I got to know them...INNER BEAUTY is much more important in my opinion.
And for the record...I would still love you VOX, even if you were 400 pounds with sagging man boobs!!
<3